New regulations for cosmetic treatments

New regulations for cosmetic treatments
Professor Sir Bruce Keogh has reviewed regulation in the cosmetic interventions sector following the PIP implant scandal. His group were surprised to discover that non-surgical interventions are almost entirely unregulated. It is their view that dermal fillers are a crisis waiting to happen and they have made recommendations to address this.

The review said ‘dermal fillers are a particular cause for concern as anyone can set themselves up as a practitioner, with no requirement for knowledge, training or previous experience. Nor are there sufficient checks in place with regard to product quality – most dermal fillers have no more controls than a bottle of floor cleaner. There has been explosive growth in this market, driven by a combination of high demand and high profits in an era when all other commercial income is stalling.

‘Previous attempts at self-regulation in the industry have failed, largely because voluntary codes have meant that only the best in this disparate sector commit themselves to better practice, whilst the unscrupulous and unsafe carry on as before.

‘Throughout our meetings, discussions and correspondence with stakeholders from all groups, professions and experts, the call has been for a new legislative framework.

‘Taken together, our recommendations provide that framework for both surgical and non-surgical interventions. They set out a range of actions to ensure practitioners have the right skills, the products used are safe, providers are responsible, people get accurate information and support is available if things go wrong. These recommendations are not about increasing bureaucracy but about putting the everyone’s safety and wellbeing first.’

0
0
0
s2sdefault

You need to be logged in to leave comments.

Please do not re-register if you have forgotten your details,
follow the links above to recover your password &/or username.
If you cannot access your email account, please contact us.

Mastodon Mastodon