Income boost for defence organisation executives reported

Report on income boost for defence organisations

A report in the GP magazine Pulse says that the UK’s three medical defence organisations have raised salaries and benefits for their top executives by hundreds of thousands of pounds in the past three years amid spiralling medical and dental indemnity fees with some top earners having salaries ‘reach close to £1 million’ last year.

The hike in salaries for the organisations’ top executives comes as professionals struggle to pay for huge hikes in their indemnity bills, the report says. They saw fees increase by an average of 26% in 2015, with one in ten medics seeing their indemnity bill double in the period. NHS England said earlier this month that it would subsidise indemnity costs with a £60 million support scheme for doctors, which is set to launch in April 2017.

But an analysis of the organisations’ accounts by Pulse has revealed that pay packets of the top executives have been increasing while the fees have gone up. Pulse has found:

MPS chief executive Mr Kayll said: ‘As a large, complex international organisation, it is important that we benchmark the salaries of council, including the chief executive, against the market rate for their roles and we seek to pay at the median rate. The chief executive’s salary is around the lower quartile of the market group, which is based on a number of mutual, similar size organisations in the financial services sectors.’

Chris Kenny Chief Executive, Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland, wrote in a letter to a national newspaper:  ‘Medical defence organisations rebut over three quarters of the claims that our members face without making any payment. The number of doctors receiving the most severe penalties at the General Medical Council has proportionately never been lower. What drives the increasing number of claims – and the resultant anxiety and organisational disruption for professionals – is a legal system which gives claimant solicitors every incentive to rack up costs and little or no incentive to select and prepare the most meritorious cases rapidly and effectively.

‘The Government has moved rather too slowly on its own welcome proposals on capping the level of legal costs that can be recovered in medical negligence cases. Nor has it pursued ideas for tort reform which have been on the table for some time. It’s time for action on these issues. The continued delay saps NHS resources and morale alike.’

0
0
0
s2sdefault

You need to be logged in to leave comments.